NPhillips Posted April 18, 2003 Report Share Posted April 18, 2003 The Playback X Fader should work more like a crossfader rather than a grand master fader. If the Playback X fader handle is not @ 10 when [GO] is executed, the memory should come in, in time, until it reaches the percentage of completion as dictated by the position of the Playback X handle. At this point (when the playing memory reaches the limit set forth by the Playback X handle), the timing of the completion of the memory should become manual. The Playback X handle is now overriding the timing/crossfade state/completion. If the Playback X handle is then lowered in level, the crossfade reverses to the levels of the previous memory. The opposite occurs when the Playback X handle is pushed to level 10 (level 0 is the previous memory). Once the Playback X handle reaches level 10, the memory is complete; the Playback X handle will have no effect until [GO] is executed again. This also means that the console needs to provide the operator with feedback indicating that the Playback X handle is not at level 10. This could achieved by alternating the Playback X slow/fast LED's, in addition to a visual alert associated with the Playback X status on the monitor. This would lessen the need for a "quickstep" function (running cues without timing for state only playback) as one could rapidly move the fader from 10 to 0 and back to 10 to complete a cue instantly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-Nine Posted April 22, 2003 Report Share Posted April 22, 2003 I don't believe that this is a 'bug' as the Playback X Master works as designed, ie a 'grand master' for the Playback X. The operation you describe above sounds very much like the way the Playback A/B works where you can output the programmed memories in the stack in turn, with manual control over fade times etc handled by the A/B Master faders and the fade time pots. The only difference being that you use the A/B masters to cross-fade between the two memories. Give it a go and see if this is the functionality you are looking for Quote K-Nine : Technically Advanced Roving Dog In Space Bran Media | Myspace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NPhillips Posted April 23, 2003 Author Report Share Posted April 23, 2003 Can we make it a Setup option? (add 'em to the pile eh?) Only because I will hardly, if ever, use the A/B fader pair... I would much rather have two (or more) automated fader pairs then 1 manual set and 1 automated. This is just a limitation of the IL500. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.